fbpx

Tag Archives for " CJEU "

Facebook can be ordered to remove content worldwide

The E.U. Court of Justice ruled that Facebook and other platforms will need to remove information or block access to any illegal material, including in some instances content that is “equivalent.” Judges also can order it taken down worldwide, “within the framework of the relevant international law.”

The decision upheld an Austrian ruling in which a politician sued Facebook to remove defamatory content and the court ordered it removed globally. Facebook had previously removed the content in Austria only.

This judgment raises critical questions around freedom of expression and the role that internet companies should play in monitoring, interpreting and removing speech that might be illegal in any particular country.

Source: Facebook can be ordered to remove content worldwide, EU says – The Washington Post

Pre-Checked Cookie Consent Invalid, EU Court Rules

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) this morning ruled that storing cookies requires internet users’ active consent.

It’s not good enough, says the CJEU, to present users with a pre-checked box and require them to click it to opt out. That consent must be specific, and that users should be informed how long cookies will be stored for and used, and whether or not third parties will have access to them.

That decision is unaffected by whether or not the information stored or accessed on the user’s equipment is personal data.

Source: Pre-Checked Cookie Consent Invalid, EU Court Rules

Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case

Europe’s top court has ruled that Google does not have to apply the right to be forgotten globally.

It means that firm only needs to remove references to articles and other material from its search results in Europe – and not elsewhere – after receiving an appropriate request.

The ruling stems from a dispute between Google and a French privacy regulator.

Source: Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case

Top European Court to Review National Data Retention Laws

The Court of Justice for the European Union will hear challenges to the data retention laws of the UK, Belgium, and France.

The Court previously invalidated European and national data retention laws that required companies to retain communications data for law enforcement purposes. The new challenges, brought by civil society organizations, contend that European national laws fail to comply with the earlier rulings.

Source: Top European Court to Review National Data Retention Laws

CJEU to answer questions about Right to be delisted

French court the Conseil d’Etat has requested the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on a series of questions concerning the implementation of the right to be delisted from search results.

The right to be delisted is not absolute. Insofar as the removal of links from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person’s name may have consequences on the legitimate interest of internet users to receive access to information, the European Court of Justice proceeds to strike a balance between such interest and the person’s fundamental rights, in particular the right to private life and to the protection of personal data.

Source: Right to be delisted

Websites Using Facebook “Like” Button Are Responsible for User Privacy

The Court of Justice for the European Union has ruled websites embedding the Facebook “like” button are responsible for user privacy.

In Fashion ID v Verbraucherzentrale NRW, the Court stated FashionID can be held jointly responsible with Facebook for compliance with Europe’s data protection rules. Facebook’s tracking technique collects the personal data of visitors to a third-party website and transfers it to Facebook.

Source: Top European Court Rules Companies Using Facebook “Like” Button Are Responsible for User Privacy

CJEU’s hearing on Schrems II has both sides worried ruling could be sweeping

On July 9 the Court of justice of European Union had its session in so called Schrems II case. The question is; whether U.S. law on the access of national security agencies to the personal data of non nationals, the Foreign Intelligence Service Act, breaks European data protection laws. And if so, does that invalidate currently legal data transfer mechanisms?

Court heard from the Irish Data Protection Commissioner, Facebook, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, DigitalEurope, the Business Software Alliance, the European Commission, the European Data Protection Board, the U.S. government as well as several EU countries and representatives of Max Schrems himself.

The EU court’s Advocate General Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe said he will give his non-binding opinion in the case December 12 this year, with a full decision expected by early 2020.

Source: CJEU’s hearing on Schrems II has both sides worried ruling could be sweeping

SCHREMS 2.0 – the demise of Standard Contractual Clauses and Privacy Shield?

On July 9th, Europe’s highest court – the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) – is set to hear a case concerning the validity of two key data transfer mechanisms: Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) and Privacy Shield – mechanisms widely used by businesses within the European Economic Area (EEA) to legitimise the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EEA.

There is a significant risk the CJEU will declare these transfer mechanisms as invalid. If this happens, many organisations will be left without any practical solution to legitimise the international transfer of personal data outside the EEA and exposure to the threat of GDPR revenue based fines, regulatory sanctions including injunctions and third party claims for compensation.

Read full article: SCHREMS 2.0 – the demise of Standard Contractual Clauses and Privacy Shield?

Privacy Shield and Standard Contractual Clauses will be assessed by European Courts

On the first and second of the July, the General Court of the European Union (which is part of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)) will hear a case against the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield brought by three French NGOs, La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network and Fédération FDN.

A week later, on 9 July, the CJEU will hear arguments in Schrems II, in which the Irish High Court has referred 11 questions relating to whether the European Commission’s Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) provide an adequate level of protection for personal data which is transferred to the US.

Judgments in these cases are expected towards the end of 2019 or beginning of 2020. there is high probability that either or both the Privacy Shield and SCCs will be invalidated as a mechanism for transferring personal data outside the EU, in a similar manner to the invalidation of Safe Harbor in 2015.

Source: Transfers on Trial: Privacy Shield and Standard Contractual Clauses go before the European Courts

Privacy Shield complaint to be heard by Europe’s top court in July

A legal challenge to the EU-US Privacy Shield, a mechanism used by thousands of companies to authorize data transfers from the European Union to the US, will be heard by Europe’s top court this summer.

The General Court of the EU has set a date of July 1 and 2 to hear the complaint brought by French digital rights group, La Quadrature du Net, against the European Commission’s renegotiated data transfer agreement which argues the arrangement is still incompatible with EU law on account of US government mass surveillance practices.

Source: EU-US Privacy Shield complaint to be heard by Europe’s top court in July

1 2 3 7
>